I just saw this over at the aomin.org site of Dr. James White. The speakers are Richard Howe, Jason Lisle, and Scott Oliphint, all of whom are excellent in evaluating and expanding upon ones presuppositional framework and how that framework determines the interpretation of evidences.
Just a short note. Yesterday evening I was doing some sermon prep on the Fourth Commandment and our ongoing obligation to keeping the Sabbath (in the Christian sense), when I came across an article which read in part; True Christians are Anti-War A fundamental, foundational tenet of our belief is opposition to carnal warfare. Of…
[T]he Christian and the unbeliever do not and cannot approach their differences with argumentative and or philosophical neutrality. Even though the Christian and non-Christian have the facts of the objective world in common, they have radically divergent interpretations of them. For the Christian, all facts are pre-interpreted by God, created by God and revelatory by…
The “Transcendental Argument for the Existence of God” argues in short that worldviews which oppose the Bible and the God of the Bible, fall well short of being able to account for the preconditions of intelligibility. What this means is opposing worldviews cannot account for that which is essential to understand human experience, such as…
Applied-Apologetics 